Turkey’s Foreign Policy in Post-Soviet Eurasia

This page is still under construction

The MEPC is transitioning to a new website infrastructure. Consequently, certain components of our articles may not be fully complete at this time. We kindly request your patience as we diligently work to enhance and update the Middle East Policy Council experience.

  • Middle East Policy

    Middle East Policy has been one of the world’s most cited publications on the region since its inception in 1982, and our Breaking Analysis series makes high-quality, diverse analysis available to a broader audience.

The central question explored in this article is what should motivate decision makers in Turkey when formulating the nation’s strategies toward the Turkic countries of Eurasia. Should it be pan-Islamism that advocates the unity of all Muslims in the world? Pan-Turkism, based on the unity of Turkic peoples living across Eurasia? Pan-Turanism, asserting the unity of Turanic people throughout the world? Or Atatürk’s pragmatism, which advocated progressive Turkism? It would be unrealistic to revive objectives that, when tested by the rulers of the Ottoman Empire, failed to prevent its collapse in 1918. What Turkey needs now are realistic policies based on common strategic interests that are geographical and relevant, and an active skilled leadership similar to Atatürk’s, whose pragmatism provided the driving force behind the founding and survival of modern Turkey.

  • Middle East Policy

    Middle East Policy has been one of the world’s most cited publications on the region since its inception in 1982, and our Breaking Analysis series makes high-quality, diverse analysis available to a broader audience.

Scroll to Top