The Biden Administration and Rojava: Old Wine, New Bottle?

This page is still under construction

The MEPC is transitioning to a new website infrastructure. Consequently, certain components of our articles may not be fully complete at this time. We kindly request your patience as we diligently work to enhance and update the Middle East Policy Council experience.

  • Middle East Policy

    Middle East Policy has been one of the world’s most cited publications on the region since its inception in 1982, and our Breaking Analysis series makes high-quality, diverse analysis available to a broader audience.

One of the domains of US foreign policy stuck on autopilot relates to Syria and, most importantly, Rojava (or AANES by its official name). The Biden administration inherited a quandary from its predecessor with no easy solution. On the one hand, the hostility of other actors in the region—especially Russia, Turkey, Iran, and Syria—render a continued US presence in northeastern Syria untenable in the long term. On the other hand, Washington cannot abandon its partners in the fight against ISIS as they did before—at least not before securing a deal beneficial to all sides. So what will President Joe Biden do with regards to Rojava? Will he adopt the policy enacted during Barack Obama’s second term? Or will he implement a new policy to address the new challenges? This article examines the challenges for US foreign policy with regards to Rojava and, on the basis of the developments thus far, analyzes whether the Biden administration’s approach will replicate Obama-era policy.

  • Middle East Policy

    Middle East Policy has been one of the world’s most cited publications on the region since its inception in 1982, and our Breaking Analysis series makes high-quality, diverse analysis available to a broader audience.

Scroll to Top