Latest Journal   |   Archive   |   Index   |   Advisory Comm.   |   Subscribe
Volume VIII, June 2001, Number 2  
 
ABSTRACT: Egypt's 2000 Parliamentary Elections
 
Mona Makram-Ebeid
 
Dr. Makram-Ebeid, a former member of Parliament, is an adjunct professor of political science at the American University in Cairo.

Hailed by many as the elections of the millennium, Egypt's longest parliamentary season ever was held in three stages (for the first time) from October 18 to November 14, 2000. This year's event, in which Egyptians voted out some ruling- party stalwarts and the Muslim Brotherhood scored its largest victory since 1987, marked a distinct improvement over the flawed 1995 contest. However, the governing elite's desire to control and manage social forces contrasted with the president's stated commitment to democracy, with the result that the governing National Democratic party (NDP) has maintained its dominance of the lower house of parliament, although not as easily as in the past.

Since the mid-1970s, Egypt's governing system has shifted from one-party authoritarian rule to limited democratization permitting the relatively open expression of views on domestic and international issues. Political forces range across a wide spectrum, from left and liberal to Islamist. Nonetheless, power remains tightly held by the executive, which utilizes the dominant political party, the ramified bureaucracy and passive security organs to implement and enforce its policies.

Egypt's electoral democracy was based on rules contained in three sets of legal documents: the Constitution of 1971, the Parties law of 1977 and the Electoral law of 1983. Elements within the opposition as well as several independent thinkers have made strenuous efforts since the first elections under Mubarak in 1984 to place the conduct of the elections under the control of the judiciary rather than the Ministry of Interior, but the government had until recently refused. However, early in July 2000, Egypt's Supreme Constitutional Court (SCC) issued a ruling requiring total judiciary supervision of elections. Furthermore, the president issued directives that elections take place over three consecutive stages. The total number of candidates was 4,116. Official response to the SCC ruling, which declared the People's Assemblies elected in 1990 and 1995 invalid due to lack of judicial supervision, was swift and efficient. An extraordinary parliamentary session was convened (parliament was on summer recess), and amendments introduced by a presidential decree were passed, establishing full judiciary supervision for all future parliamentary elections. In the wake of parliamentary response, the opposition press heralded the triumph of the rule of law and praised President Mubarak for working within the constitution.
 
Middle East Policy Council
1730 M Street NW, Suite 512
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 296-6767  -  Fax: (202) 296-5791
info@mepc.org
HOME  |  JOURNAL  |  FORUMS  |  WORKSHOPS  |  RESOURCES  |  ABOUT  |  WHAT'S NEW
 
All Rights Reserved - 2002 - Middle East Policy Council