Latest Journal   |   Archive   |   Index   |   Advisory Comm.   |   Subscribe
Volume VIII, June 2001, Number 2  
 
ABSTRACT: Morocco’s Economic Prospects: Daunting Challenges Ahead
 
Guilain Denoeux
 
Dr. Denoeux is associate professor of government at Colby College in Waterville, Maine. This article draws on interviews conducted in Morocco in June 2000 and January 2001.

December 2000 and January 2001 brought much-needed good news for Morocco's economy. First, on December 20, the French conglomerate Vivendi bought a 35-percent stake in Maroc Télécom, Morocco's state telecommunications company. This partial privatization brought a considerable 23.3 billion dirhams (approximately $2.2 billion) into the state coffers. Then there was the abundant rainfall of mid-to-late December, which continued through January. The international economic environment, too, suddenly appeared far more favorable to the kingdom, as reflected in particular through lower oil prices and a rising euro.

Unfortunately, Morocco's economic future presents many pitfalls not reflected in these recent developments. For one, the Youssoufi government's failure to design and implement a clear economic strategy has prevented Morocco from making progress toward overcoming its deficits in social and economic areas. Indeed, some of the kingdom's major problems -- poverty unemployment, social disparities -- seem to have worsened in the past several years. Meanwhile, not enough has been accomplished toward creating a more favorable environment for business activity. Consequently, private investment, both domestic and foreign, has lagged, thus thwarting Morocco's only chance to jump-start its economy and place itself on the path toward sustainable growth.

Meanwhile, no genuine program of industrial modernization and restructuring appears to be under way. Known in Morocco as mise à niveau--raising productivity standards within companies to make them competitive on international markets -- such a program is critical to the kingdom's ability to withstand the shock of increased foreign competition as the free-trade agreement with Europe is being gradually implemented. For their part, Morocco's public finances look precarious, especially in light of the significant wage and benefits concessions made by the government during the summer of 2000. The weakness of long-term capital investment, combined with the government's tendency to seek to buy social peace, raises serious questions about Morocco's financial situation in the years ahead.

Finally, 1999 and 2000 witnessed unprecedented and dangerously high levels of labor unrest, a breakdown in the dialogue between employers and unions, as well as mutual recriminations between the government and business circles. This situation will have to be addressed if Morocco is to resolve the problems that have been identified above. Increased private investment, mise à niveau, and a stabilization of the country's public finances all depend, to a large extent, on rekindling the country's much-vaunted social dialogue of years past.

This is not to say that all the news about the economy is negative. Macroeconomic indicators are generally good, certainly far better than two decades ago. For all the administrative constraints that continue to hinder investment and business transactions, the country today presents an environment far more conducive to entrepreneurship than it used to be. The cumulative impact of the reforms implemented during the decade of structural adjustment (1983-1993) has been considerable, and has fostered private initiative and risk-taking, as reflected in a new generation of internationally oriented businesspersons eager to try their chance on world markets. Meanwhile, at the highest levels of government, a new group of highly trained, energetic decision makers is asserting itself. Graduates from France's most prestigious schools (grandes écoles) and, increasingly, from American universities, these individuals have a powerful and compelling vision of Morocco's future. In trying circumstances, they struggle every day to turn that vision into a reality, and their efforts help explain why Morocco gives of itself the image of a country that is not afraid of globalization.

In short, Morocco remains a country with substantial economic assets. But it also cries out for a genuine economic strategy, further economic restructuring, and a business culture that is more conducive to national development. As things currently stand, the economy lacks clear stewardship. Private investment is stagnating, while privatization and economic liberalization are not proceeding with the urgency required. Long-term capital investment is insufficient, and recent government decisions have cast a shadow over public finances. Industrial modernization and restructuring are lagging, while labor relations remain troubled. And in social areas that are vital to economic development, such as health and education, indicators are not improving fast and significantly enough. Such a situation calls for a more proactive approach than has prevailed thus far. Indeed, if Morocco does not take the initiative to bring about, on its own, the transformations that are required, it runs the risk of seeing these changes being imposed from the outside, as was the case in 1983, when near-bankrupcy placed the kingdom at the mercy of the World Bank. The next couple of years will be decisive in this respect.
 
Middle East Policy Council
1730 M Street NW, Suite 512
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 296-6767  -  Fax: (202) 296-5791
info@mepc.org
HOME  |  JOURNAL  |  FORUMS  |  WORKSHOPS  |  RESOURCES  |  ABOUT  |  WHAT'S NEW
 
All Rights Reserved - 2002 - Middle East Policy Council