Russia and the Kurds: A Soft-Power Tool for the Kremlin?

This page is still under construction

The MEPC is transitioning to a new website infrastructure. Consequently, certain components of our articles may not be fully complete at this time. We kindly request your patience as we diligently work to enhance and update the Middle East Policy Council experience.

  • Anna Borshchevskaya

    Dr. Borshchevskaya is a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and author of Putin's War in Syria: Russian Foreign Policy and the Price of America's Absence (I.B. Tauris, 2021).

 

Abstract

Russia has been the Kurds’ patron for more than two centuries, motivated primarily by the cynical desire to use them against adversaries in broader great-power games while casting itself as a champion of the Kurdish cause. Russia’s longstanding and multifaceted relationship with the Kurds demonstrates that when it comes to geopolitics, the United States has more than brute force to contend with. The Russian state also utilizes soft power as an authoritarian state defines it: a tool of pragmatic leverage. While the Kurds are not a monolith, they are anxious about the trajectory of US politics and feel they cannot rely on anyone. The Russian state has opportunities to undermine American interests in places such as Syria and Iraq through its connections with Kurdish groups. This article reviews tsarist, Soviet, and post-Soviet policies toward the Kurds, including Kurdish communities in Russia. It concludes with a discussion about implications for the United States, given that Moscow will not let go of its Kurdish card, including in the context of the Ukraine invasion.

  • Anna Borshchevskaya

    Dr. Borshchevskaya is a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and author of Putin's War in Syria: Russian Foreign Policy and the Price of America's Absence (I.B. Tauris, 2021).

Scroll to Top